In what universe is this look considered flattering? I really want to know so I can make sure to avoid ever going there. I found this fashion atrocity in an email from Bergdorf. It's a Derek Lam tunic coat ($4990) and slouched trousers ($890). The pants are even more hideous in the closeup picture on their site.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
Seriously?
In what universe is this look considered flattering? I really want to know so I can make sure to avoid ever going there. I found this fashion atrocity in an email from Bergdorf. It's a Derek Lam tunic coat ($4990) and slouched trousers ($890). The pants are even more hideous in the closeup picture on their site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is truly baffling! Even more baffling than the smock top, which I suppose can at least look cute if you are ultra skinny. I myself am an hourglass shape however, which I had thought (silly me) was a womanly shape. To me, not emphasising a waist on most shapes and sizes just seems, well, rather silly. This top looks bad on an actual model, on me, it would look hideous. The shoes are nice though.
ReplyDelete